<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Manifold Witness: The Plurality of Truth by John Franke (Chapter 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foolishsage.com/2009/09/26/manifold-witness-the-plurality-of-truth-by-john-franke-chapter-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foolishsage.com/2009/09/26/manifold-witness-the-plurality-of-truth-by-john-franke-chapter-2/</link>
	<description>the out-of-context contextuality of a foolish sage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:59:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Traphagen</title>
		<link>http://foolishsage.com/2009/09/26/manifold-witness-the-plurality-of-truth-by-john-franke-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-125912</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Traphagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolishsage.com/?p=1701#comment-125912</guid>
		<description>Sabio,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To be clear, the post does not necessarily express &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; &quot;notion of Plurality of truth.&quot; I am summarizing a chapter in a book by John Franke.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to your question, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s what Franke is discussing here (soteriology: the study of salvation). He is not dealing with the question of what is sufficient for salvation, but rather what is a truly biblical/Christian conception of truth. He is trying to make a case that the Christian concept of God as Trinity (unity in diversity; diversity in unity) both necessitates and allows a range of diversity within our attempts to apprehend truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sabio,</p>
<p>To be clear, the post does not necessarily express <i>my</i> &#8220;notion of Plurality of truth.&#8221; I am summarizing a chapter in a book by John Franke.</p>
<p>As to your question, I don&#39;t think that&#39;s what Franke is discussing here (soteriology: the study of salvation). He is not dealing with the question of what is sufficient for salvation, but rather what is a truly biblical/Christian conception of truth. He is trying to make a case that the Christian concept of God as Trinity (unity in diversity; diversity in unity) both necessitates and allows a range of diversity within our attempts to apprehend truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabio</title>
		<link>http://foolishsage.com/2009/09/26/manifold-witness-the-plurality-of-truth-by-john-franke-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-125911</link>
		<dc:creator>sabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolishsage.com/?p=1701#comment-125911</guid>
		<description>I read quickly through this post but was not clear on your notion of Plurality of truth.   Could an ex-Christian who is clearly an atheist have a vision of reality (if beliefs/faith are important) and a practice of life (if works are important to you) that could gain them salvation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read quickly through this post but was not clear on your notion of Plurality of truth.   Could an ex-Christian who is clearly an atheist have a vision of reality (if beliefs/faith are important) and a practice of life (if works are important to you) that could gain them salvation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Traphagen</title>
		<link>http://foolishsage.com/2009/09/26/manifold-witness-the-plurality-of-truth-by-john-franke-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-125791</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Traphagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolishsage.com/?p=1701#comment-125791</guid>
		<description>Sabio,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To be clear, the post does not necessarily express &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; &quot;notion of Plurality of truth.&quot; I am summarizing a chapter in a book by John Franke.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As to your question, I don&#039;t think that&#039;s what Franke is discussing here (soteriology: the study of salvation). He is not dealing with the question of what is sufficient for salvation, but rather what is a truly biblical/Christian conception of truth. He is trying to make a case that the Christian concept of God as Trinity (unity in diversity; diversity in unity) both necessitates and allows a range of diversity within our attempts to apprehend truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sabio,</p>
<p>To be clear, the post does not necessarily express <i>my</i> &#8220;notion of Plurality of truth.&#8221; I am summarizing a chapter in a book by John Franke.</p>
<p>As to your question, I don&#39;t think that&#39;s what Franke is discussing here (soteriology: the study of salvation). He is not dealing with the question of what is sufficient for salvation, but rather what is a truly biblical/Christian conception of truth. He is trying to make a case that the Christian concept of God as Trinity (unity in diversity; diversity in unity) both necessitates and allows a range of diversity within our attempts to apprehend truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabio</title>
		<link>http://foolishsage.com/2009/09/26/manifold-witness-the-plurality-of-truth-by-john-franke-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-125790</link>
		<dc:creator>sabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foolishsage.com/?p=1701#comment-125790</guid>
		<description>I read quickly through this post but was not clear on your notion of Plurality of truth.   Could an ex-Christian who is clearly an atheist have a vision of reality (if beliefs/faith are important) and a practice of life (if works are important to you) that could gain them salvation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read quickly through this post but was not clear on your notion of Plurality of truth.   Could an ex-Christian who is clearly an atheist have a vision of reality (if beliefs/faith are important) and a practice of life (if works are important to you) that could gain them salvation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
