Faith and Heartaches

fire_alarm.gif Faith is one of those words I have struggled with for a long time. As a person of the Reformed persuasion, sola fide is supposed to be the cheer for my team (although I think sometimes semper fi would be better). But what is faith? Reformed theology tells us that you can’t be justified before God without it, but “it” isn’t anything you do. And just to complicate matters further, we’re told that “we are justified by faith alone, but the faith which justifies is never alone.” I’m still not sure I really understand what that means.

More recently I’ve felt befuddled by the justification/NPP/FV wars raging across the blogosphere and in every other publisher shipment arriving at my bookstore. In way too many of these it sounds like those on the attack are saying that “saving faith” is dependent upon crossing every theological “t” and dotting every soteriological “i.”

I guess that is why I found this very comforting:

…faith isn’t something we are to try to work up in ourselves. It isn’t some inner state of certainty to which we somehow attain. God, in his mercy towards us, does not require us to hold within our heads at one moment the whole truth of Christianity, and to assent to it. Rather, he comes to us with concrete, audible promises: “Your sins are forgiven”; “Grace, mercy and peace to you from God our Father and our Lord Jesus Christ”; “This is my body, given for you… this cup is the new testament in my blood, shed for you for the forgiveness of your sins”. Faith is believing the promise we are hearing right now.

From “Doubts and Loves and Faith” on Confessing Evangelical (HT: Alistair)

0 blog reaction(s) so far

     Share on Facebook Share on Facebook     Share on FriendFeed

7 Responses to “Faith and Heartaches”

  1. Tony Says:

    Mark I feel the weight of your burden here man, that quote was a wonderful reminder that God is at work establishing faith in our lives in the present. Orthodoxy can sometimes look like works righteousness can’t it. Thanks brother, Sets

  2. Jeff Says:

    Mark,
    I am right there with you. Thanks for your honesty and the great quote. This quote brings great comfort. I need to file that away.

    Jeff

  3. Craig Higgins Says:

    Great quote! What’s the source?

  4. Mark Traphagen Says:

    See the link below the quote. As far as I can see, it was original to the author of the post on Confessing Evangelical blog.

  5. JD Says:

    Something I’ve been thinking about for a while: whether there is a new perspective. My inclination nowadays after a few years of reflecting on this supposed debate is to say “no, there isn’t one. At least, not in the sense people are actually using the term.” I tend to think the whole thing would be better served if we just jettisoned the term.

  6. Mark Traphagen Says:

    Is that because you think there is nothing actually “new” about it, JD?

  7. JD Says:

    It’s because the consensus is sufficiently narrow and the points of view sufficiently diverse that giving it a label sufficiently muddles just about everything. And besides, it’s not new. Most modern scholarship has been operating with the basic assumptions for 30 years now. They’re in a post-new perspective era. In that sense, yes, it’s not new.

Leave a Reply

Track with co.mments