iMonk on TR’s and Lucke on Epistemlogical Humility
The Internet Monk attempts to explain and defend the label “TR”, and in a related post, Glenn Lucke of Common Grounds Online explains why “epistemologcial humility” is not only not a slippery slope (there’s that term again!) to theological liberalism, but rather ought to be a foundational attitude for those who stand within Reformed orthodoxy because of their Reformed teaching and not in spite of it.
And, to paraphrase Red Green, “If my wife is watching, Sweety, I’ll be right back to my Amos translation after this post!” I’m a man, but I can change. If I have to. I guess.

December 4th, 2006 at 7:57 pm
[...] [Preface: Having read the Foolish Sage’s post pointing me toward iMonk’s post on the “Truly Reformed” and to Glenn Lucke’s response at Common Grounds, I was inspired to write this bit below. It is a companion post to my, “The Dangers of the ‘ditch theory’.” (Just in case you get confused, this conversation never really took place.)] [...]